CBD Oil is good for Dogs

Posted by Craig Wrigley on

Research Paper:  A veterinary study showed CBD significantly decreased pain and increased mobility in animals with increasingly common osteoarthritis (OA). 

                         

This study supports the safety and therapeutic potential of hemp-derived CBD for relieving arthritic pain and suggests follow-up investigations in humans are warranted.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of daily cannabidiol for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis pain.

Abstract:
Over the last 2 decades, affirmative diagnoses of osteoarthritis (OA) in the United States have tripled due to increasing rates of obesity and an aging population. Hemp-derived cannabidiol (CBD) is the major non-tetrahydrocannabinol component of cannabis and has been promoted as a potential treatment for a wide variety of disparate inflammatory conditions. Here, we evaluated CBD for its ability to modulate the production of proinflammatory cytokines in vitro and in murine models of induced inflammation and further
validated the ability of a liposomal formulation to increase bioavailability in mice and in humans. Subsequently, the therapeutic potential of both naked and liposomally encapsulated CBD was explored in a 4-week, randomized placebo-controlled, double-blinded study in a spontaneous canine model of OA. In vitro and in mouse models, CBD significantly attenuated the production of
proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-a while elevating levels of anti-inflammatory IL-10. In the veterinary study, CBD significantly decreased pain and increased mobility in a dose-dependent fashion among animals with an affirmative diagnosis of OA. Liposomal CBD (20 mg/day) was as effective as the highest dose of nonliposomal CBD (50 mg/day) in improving clinical outcomes. Hematocrit, comprehensive metabolic profile, and clinical chemistry indicated no significant detrimental impact of CBDadministration over the 4-week analysis period. This study supports the safety and therapeutic potential of hemp-derived CBD for relieving arthritic pain and suggests follow-up investigations in humans are warranted.

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, Cannabidiol, Randomized trial, Liposomal encapsulation, TNF-a, IL-6


1. Background
Arthritis is a leading cause of pain, disfigurement, and disability in the United States where nearly one-quarter of all adults have received an affirmative diagnosis.2 Although the incidence of  rheumatoid arthritis has remained constant, osteoarthritis (OA)  diagnoses have tripled since 2000 due to an aging population, increasing levels of obesity, and greater physician recognition of
its prevalence. Accordingly, OA is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability among the elderly.23 Irrespective of the precipitating cause, the pathology of joint destruction in arthritis is driven by an overlapping profile of pathologic inflammatory cytokines including TNF-a, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-17, and IL-21.26,46,49 In addition, pain, inflammation, and joint destruction among both etiologies are
mediated by overlapping subsets of innate cell types, most prominently neutrophils.16,45 Treatment of rheumatoid arthritis consists of both targeted and nonspecific immunosuppressive drug regimens (disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs), whereas treatment of OA consists of analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, and joint replacement
supplemented by a weight loss regimen, if applicable. In either case, pharmacomodulation is not curative and often accompanied by severe side-effects.6,9,36 Because pain is the predominant symptom of OA, it is also the primary target of intervention. Recent reviews comparing the efficacy of pharmacotherapies for reducing OA pain conclude opioids are most effective, however, abuse potential limits utility. Overall, the effect size across all pharmacotherapies is small (0.39), signaling a need for additional treatments with novel and complementary mechanisms of action.1,32,54,61 The ubiquitous endocannabinoid system plays a role in many physiological and pathophysiological processes. Consistent with this, cannabis and its  constituents are increasingly being recognized as bona fide pharmacologic agents with significant therapeutic potential. For example, cannabidiol (CBD), the major nontetrahydrocannabinol (THC) constituent of cannabis, can exert numerous biological effects through several different receptors and signaling pathways, including anti-inflammatory Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.  C.D. Verrico, S. Wesson, W.K. Decker, and M.M. Halpert contributed equally to the preparation of this manuscript. 


a) Department of Psychiatry, b Department of Pharmacology, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, TX, United States, c Sunset Animal Hospital, Houston, TX,
United States, d Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, TX, United States, e Valimenta Labs, Fort Collins, CO, United States, f Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, g Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States, h Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, i Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States *Corresponding author. Address: Tel.: 713-798-1560; fax: 713-798-3700. E-mail address: halpert@bcm.edu (M.H. Halpert). Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.painjournalonline.com).
PAIN 161 (2020) 2191–2202 © 2020 International Association for the Study of Pain http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001896 September2020·Volume 161·Number 9 www.painjournalonline.com 2191 Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

b) effects in both acute and chronic conditions.10–13,20,25,43,47,51,57
Indeed, preclinical rodent models suggest the therapeutic potential of CBD in combating the underlying causes of both rheumatoid arthritis and OA.15,35,37,48 Although preclinical rodent models have provided evidence of
efficacy for novel compounds to treat pain,8,19,29 the clinical efficacy or safety of these compounds in human studies has been unsatisfying.58,59 The late-stage failures of promising compounds in randomized studies have suggested a disconnect between the preclinical models used to study structural vs symptomatic aspects of disease.17 Indeed, the initiating event and many of the
pathological changes in the commonly used, chemically induced preclinical rodent models of chronic OA pain are not typical of human OA.17,56 By contrast, spontaneous models, particularly domesticated canine models, are more appropriate for assessing OA pain treatments because they closely mimic the pathophysiology and pathogenesis of human OA pain.17 In the present
work, we determined the in vitro and in vivo effects of CBD on expression levels of shared, pathologic proinflammatory cytokines, and innate cell subsets in multiple model systems. Subsequently, the safety and efficacy of CBD were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in a spontaneous
canine model.


2. Methods
2.1. Cannabidiol
Cannabidiol, provided by MedterraCBD (Irvine, CA), was isolated solely from hemp grown and extracted under the strict guidelines of the Kentucky Department of Agricultural Industrial Hemp pilot program. Subsequent analysis by third party (ProVerde Laboratories, Milford, MA) mass spectrometry confirmed the absence of D9-THC, other cannabinoid derivatives, and contaminants while further HPLC testing demonstrated CBD isolate purity of 99.9%.


For all assays, CBD was solubilized in fractionated coconut oil. Liposomal CBD was produced using a sunflower lecithin (phosphatidylcholine) base. Each liposome was approximately 100 nm, allowing for encapsulation of 10 to 20 mg/mL CBD.  Transmission electron microscopy was used to observe and
confirm the stability of liposomal CBD concentration, size, and polydispersity after storage at 4°C for at least 3 months. Briefly, samples were placed on 150 mesh formvar-coated copper grids treated with poly-l-lysine for approximately 1 hour, then negatively stained with filtered aqueous 2%ammonium molybdate10.02% BSA, pH 7.0 for 1 minute. Stain was blotted dry from the grids
with filter paper, and samples were allowed to dry. Samples were then examined in a JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL USA, Peabody, MA) at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.  Digital images were obtained using the AMT Imaging System (Advanced Microscopy Techniques Corp, Danvers, MA).

2.2. Cell culture
Mouse RAW267.4 macrophage cells (ATCC, Manasas, VA),
primary mouse splenocytes, human monocytic THP-1 cells
(ATCC), and human PBMC were plated in a single well of a 6-
well plate in 5-mL RPMI (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 5% CO2 in a 37°C
humidified incubator for either 2 (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]) or 4
hours (staphylococcal enterotoxin B [SEB]) before addition of
CBD. Lipopolysaccharide and SEB concentrations used were
determined by previous publications and/or empirical testing in
cell culture. TNF-⍺ levels in cell culture supernatants were
determined using the TNF Flex Set immunoassay (BD Biosciences,
San Jose, CA) as measured by an LSR II or Canto Violet flow
cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo version
10.0.00003 (Tree Star, Inc, Ashland, OR). All points were assayed
in triplicate with at least 3 independent repetitions unless stated
otherwise.

2.3. Mice
Approximately 342 female, 6- to 10-week-old C57BL/6 J mice
with a weight range of 18 to 27 g were procured from Baylor
College of Medicine or the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME)
and maintained in accordance with the specific IACUC requirements
of Baylor College of Medicine and in accordance with
animal protocol AN-7942. Mice were housed under controlled
standard conditions (2361°C, 55610% humidity and a 12-hour
light/dark cycle) and provided standard laboratory chow and
autoclaved water ad libitum.

2.4. Croton oil-induced ear inflammation model
All experiments were conducted between 10 AM and 3 PM, to
avoid the influence of circadian variations in corticosteroid levels
in the murine inflammatory response. Croton oil (2.5% in acetone)
was topically applied (100 mL) to the right ear. Two hours after
croton oil was applied, vehicle or 100 mL of 10 mg/mL CBD oil
was topically applied to swollen and control ears. Two hours after
these treatments, ear tissue samples were collected to determine
myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity, and blood samples were
collected by retrobleed to determine circulating TNF-⍺ levels.

2.5. Lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation model
Lipopolysaccharide (200 ng) was administered intraperitoneally.
Two hours after LPS administration, mice were injected intraperitoneally
with CBD (1, 10, or 100 mg) or administered either
CBD (100 mg) or 18.3% methyl salicylate/16% menthol (Ben-Gay;
Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) topically at the LPS
injection site. Two hours after treatments, blood samples were
collected by retro-orbital bleed to determine cytokine and
neutrophil levels.

2.6. Tissue myeloperoxidase activity
In brief, ear tissue samples (4-mm punch) collected at 1, 2, 3, or 4
hours after croton oil was applied were homogenized in MPO
assay buffer (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) per the manufacturer’s
instructions. Samples and MPO assay buffer were equilibrated to
room temperature before use, and samples were diluted 1:5 in
assay buffer. Groups were assayed in triplicate in individual wells
in 50 mL of reaction mix for 2 hours at room temperature before
addition of 2 mL of stop mixture. Subsequently, 50 mL of TMB
developer substrate was added and incubated for 10 minutes,
and the output was measured by spectrophotometry at
OD412 nm.

2.7. Cytokine and neutrophil analysis
Mice were bled retro-orbitally at specified intervals. Blood
samples were mixed with 0.5M EDTA to prevent clotting then
pelleted to extract the serum. Red blood cells in the cell pellet
were lysed by suspension in ammonium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich,
St. Louis, MO) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The remaining
white blood cells were then stained for neutrophils by CD45-
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2192 C.D. Verrico et al.·161 (2020) 2191–2202 PAIN®
APC-Cy7, CD11b-APC, Ly6G-FITC, and CD115-PE (all from
BioLegend, San Diego, CA) before analysis by flow cytometry.
The serum was subsequently analyzed for various cytokines
using the BD flex set (BD Biosciences). In brief, sera were diluted
with supplied buffer per manufacturer’s instructions, incubated
with the appropriate capture antibody/bead for 1 hour at room
temperature, incubated with the detection antibody/bead for
another hour at room temperature, washed, centrifuged,
resuspended in flow buffer, and analyzed by flow cytometry.

2.8. Bioluminescence imaging
Mice were subcutaneously injected with 5 3 105 luc21 KRAS
tumor cells near the hindquarters 24 hours before experimentation.
Subsequently, mice were subcutaneously injected with 100
mL either 10-mg/mL naked D-luciferin (Regis Technologies,
Morton Grove, IL) or 10 mg/mL liposomally encapsulated Dluciferin
near the forequarters on the ipsilateral side. Mice were
then analyzed continuously by IVIS imaging (Caliper Life
Sciences, Waltham, MA) for 2 hours.

2.9. Human subjects bioavailability trial design
A longitudinal crossover study to compare the bioavailability of
liposomal vs naked CBD was approved and performed under an
IRB-approved protocol under the auspices and guidance of the
Institute for Regenerative and Cellular Medicine (IRCM, Santa
Monica, CA). After provision of informed consent, subjects were
randomized regarding the order of which to receive an isolate of
either naked CBD or liposomally encapsulated CBD. At first study
visit, peripheral blood was drawn after overnight fasting to
measure the baseline CBD blood levels. Subjects then orally
ingested an amount of isolate equivalent to 10 mg CBD in either
naked or liposomally encapsulated form. One hour after the
product was ingested, a second blood draw was taken to
determine circulating levels of CBD. Two weeks later at the
second study visit, the same procedure was followed with the
exception that the study subject was administered the converse
form of delivery not received at the first study visit. Subjects were
eligible for inclusion if (1) between the ages of 25 and 70, (2) able
to read and sign the informed consent and stay compliant with
study requirements and schedule, (3) not taking any other CBD
product concurrently, and (4) in good general health. Patients
with terminal illnesses were prohibited from study participation.
Bioavailability ratio of liposomally encapsulated CBD to naked
CBD administration was calculated using an LOQ value of 0.05
ng/mL (limit of detection) if naked CBD administration produced
undetectable levels of circulating CBD.

2.10. Osteoarthritis veterinary trial design
Canine veterinary studies were performed with approval and
oversight of protocolMed-1022019 by theMedterra CBDscientific
and animalwelfare advisory board. The study population consisted
of client-owned dogs presenting to Sunset Animal Hospital
(Houston, TX) for evaluation and treatment of lameness due to
OA. Owners completed a brief questionnaire to define the affected
limb(s), duration of lameness, and duration of analgesic or other
medications taken.Dogswere considered for inclusion in the study
if they (1) received an affirmative diagnosed of OA by a veterinarian
and (2) demonstrated signs of pain according to assessment by
their owners, detectable lameness on visual gait assessment, and
painful joint(s) upon palpation. Complete blood count (CBC) and
serum chemistry were performed at presentation to rule out other
underlying disease. Dogs were excluded by the attending study
veterinarian if they exhibited evidence of uncontrolled renal,
endocrine, neurologic, or neoplastic disease or were undergoing
physical therapy. No cases of OA were related to trauma, and no
animals with end-stage disease were enrolled. All other medications
were discontinued at least 2 weeks before enrollment, and
dogs were not allowed to receive any medications during the 4-
week study period except the study medication. Large (.20 kg,
mean 41 6 15 kg) domestic canines were enrolled in the 4-week,
randomized placebo-controlled trial in which both owner and
veterinarian were blinded. After provision of informed owner
consent, 20 study subjects were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to 1
of 4 groups: placebo, 20 mg/day (0.5 mg/kg) naked CBD, 50 mg/
day (1.2mg/kg) naked CBD, or 20 mg/day liposomal CBD. Simple
randomization was achieved by providing the blinded study drug
regimens to the veterinary investigator in a randomized numerical
order labeled 1 to 20 as assigned by the rolling of a die. After
randomization, aggregate average weight of each study group
remained within one SD of all other study groups. Blood was
collected forCBCand clinical chemistry at initiation and at day 30 of
treatment. Before treatment initiation and at day 30, each dog was
evaluated by the study veterinarian who assessed locomotion
because it related to walking, running, and assuming a standing
position from both a sitting and lying down position on a 5-point
scale (1 5 best) during physical examination. Owners also
evaluated dogs before treatment and at weeks 4 and 6 using the
Helsinki Chronic Pain Index, a validated, 11-item assessment of
treatment response in dogs with OA pain scored ordinally on
a scale from 0 to 4.18

2.11. Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean 6 SD unless otherwise
specified. Student’s t-test was used for pairwise comparisons,
and one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc Tukey–
Kramer was used for analysis of multiple comparisons. Normality
of data was determined by Q-Q plot. Statistical significance was
defined as P , 0.05 unless stated otherwise. Sample sizes for
mouse, canine, and human experiments were based on power
analysis indicating that a difference in mean value (Dm) as small as
0.25-fold could be detected with a power of 0.8 and type I error
rate (a) of 0.05 with a sample size of 4 subjects assuming a SD (s)
of 0.33. Given this calculation, we chose a sample size of 5
subjects for all experimental groups to permit even greater
statistical discernment power (,Dm of 25%) and/or to accommodate
greater variance (s . 1/3 SD) between groups.

3. Results
3.1. Cannabidiol reduces proinflammatory TNF-a secretion in vitro
It has been widely reported that CBD possesses significant antiinflammatory
properties in a variety of different experimental
systems.27 To validate that the CBD used for these studies might
potentiate anti-inflammatory effects relevant to arthritis, 2
different inflammatory stimuli were applied to 4 different relevant
cell populations including a mouse monocyte cell line, a human
monocyte cell line, primary mouse PBMC, and primary human
PBMC. As illustrated in Figure 1, both LPS and SEB induced logfold
elevations in TNF-a secretion in comparison with untreated
or CBD-only treated controls from RAW267.4 mouse cells,
primary mouse PBMC, THP-1 human cells, and primary human
PBMC. However, concurrent application of 100 ng/mL CBD in
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
September 2020·Volume 161·Number 9 www.painjournalonline.com 2193
conjunction with LPS treatment induced a 42% (primary human
PBMC) to 97% (human THP-1 cells) reduction in TNF-a
secretion. Similarly, concurrent application of 100 ng/mL CBD
in conjunction with SEB treatment induced a 55% (RAW267.4
mouse cells) to 63% (human THP-1 cells) reduction in TNF-a
secretion (Figs. 1A–D, *P , 0.05 or **P , 0.01).

3.2. Cannabidiol induces broad anti-inflammatory effects in vivo
Encouraged by the in vitro data, we next used 2 different mouse
inflammatory models to analyze the impact of CBD on local and
systemic inflammation in vivo.Wefirst used the croton oil model in
which topical administration of croton oil to the ear of a mouse
induces an inflammatory reaction that includes edema, erythema,
neutrophil influx, and the production of proinflammatory TNF-⍺.28
Two hours after application of 2.5% croton oil 6 topical
application of 1mg CBD, local MPO activity (a proxy for neutrophil
influx) was measured. As indicated in Figure 1E, MPO activity in
the treated ear was reduced over 80% (*P , 0.05) with
concurrent application of CBD. Four hours after croton oil
application, levels of circulating TNF-a were assessed. As shown
in Figure 1F, circulating TNF-a was decreased by 50% among
mice to which croton oil 1 CBD had been applied in comparison
with croton oil alone (*P , 0.05). Cannabidiol treatment also
significantly reduced the development of edema.
Figure 1. CBD reduces hallmarks of arthritis-related inflammation in vitro. A total of 5 3 106 cells of the specified type were plated in triplicate in 6-well plates in 5-
mL RPMI110% FBS followed by addition of either 1-ng/mL LPS for 4 hours or 100-ng/mL SEB for 6 hours with or without the addition of 100-ng/mL CBD after 2 hours. After the incubation period, the media were analyzed using the BD TNF-⍺ Flex set. (A) TNF-⍺ levels in murine RAW267.4 macrophage cell line. (B) TNF-⍺ levels in primary mouse splenocytes. (C) TNF-⍺ levels in human THP-1monocyte cell line. (D) TNF-⍺ levels in primary human PBMC. Representative experiment of 3 shown. Error bars 6 SD. *P , 0.05, **,0.01 by Student’s two-tailed t test for all (A2D). Cohorts of female mice were also treated on one ear with 100-mL 2% croton oil-acetone, and ear edema was allowed to occur for 1 to 4 hours. At 2 hours, mice were treated on the swollen ear with either 100 mL of vehicle or 100 mLof 10-mg/mL CBD oil. In addition, a group of untreated mice also received 100-mL CBD oil (E). At each time point indicated, 4-mm biopsies from the most central portion of swellingwere obtained, homogenized, and measured for myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity by ELISA. (F) After 4 hours, each cohort was retro-orbitally bled for analysis of circulating TNF-⍺ concentrations using the BD TNF⍺ Flex set. Each cohort consisted of n 5 5 mice. Representative experiment of 3 shown. Error bars 6 SD. *P , 0.05 by Student’s two-tailed t test. CBD, cannabidiol; LPS, lipopolysaccharide. Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.  2194 C.D. Verrico et al.·161 (2020) 2191–2202 PAIN®.


When administered intraperitoneally, LPS induces an inflammatory
response that includes increased expression of proinflammatory TNF-a and IL-6, 2 cytokines relevant to the pathogenesis of arthritis. In this model system, 200 ng of LPS was administered intraperitoneally. Two hours later, mice were
then treated intraperitoneally with increasing doses of CBD (1, 10, or 100 mg) or topically with a single CBD dose of 100 mg. After an additional 2 hours, the impact of CBD treatment on circulating cytokine levels was assessed. As indicated, intraperitoneal administration of CBD reduced circulating TNF-a and IL-6 levels in a dose-responsive fashion, and 100 mg of topically applied
CBD generated an anti-inflammatory effect similar to that of 100 mg injected intraperitoneally (Fig. 2A/B). Interestingly, systemic administration of CBD alone increased levels of anti-inflammatory IL-10 in the absence of inflammatory stimulus, an effect that was significantly potentiated in the presence of LPS (Fig. 2C).  Application of 18.3% methyl salicylate/16% menthol (Ben-Gay)
made no significant impact on any of these cytokine concentrations. In contrast to alterations in proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels, significant changes to circulating neutrophil chemoattractants CXCL1 (KC) and CXCL2 (MIP-2) were not observed (Fig. 2D/E). Nonetheless, circulating
neutrophil levels were reduced up to 60% among LPS-treated mice to which CBD had been administered (Fig. 2F).  3.3. Liposomal packaging of cannabidiol enhances bioavailability in vivo Although CBD clearly displayed a role in regulating inflammation in both in vitro and in vivo murine models, the relatively low bioavailability of this hydrophobic molecule when administered orally may reduce its effectiveness. To potentially improve absorption of hydrophobic CBD isolate, we packaged it within liposomes, a vehicle delivery system previously shown to improve uptake of other hydrophobic compounds.30 Using sunflower
lecithin as a base, phosphatidylcholine liposomes approximately Figure 2. Intraperitoneal CBD administration reduces inflammatory cytokines and circulating neutrophils in an in vivo LPS inflammatory model. Cohorts of female
mice were treated intraperitoneally with 200-ng LPS for 2 hours and subsequently administered intraperitoneal CBD, intraperitoneal PBS control, topical CBD, or topical Ben-Gay control as indicated. After an additional 2 hours, mice were retro-orbitally bled and circulating cytokines were analyzed with the appropriate BD Flex set. (A) TNF-a. (B) IL-6. (C) IL-10. (D) CXCL1. (E) CXCL2. (F) Flow cytometry analysis of the cellular portion was performed each hour to determine relative number of neutrophils (CD115neg CD11b1 Ly6G1) in circulation. Representative experiment shown. Error bars 6 SD. *P , 0.05, **,0.01 by one-way ANOVA. CBD, cannabidiol; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.  September 2020·Volume 161·Number 9 www.painjournalonline.com 2195
100 nm in diameter and loaded with 10 to 20 mg/mL CBD were
produced. Electron microscopy demonstrated that liposomal
CBD was stable at both room temperature and 4°C and between
pH 5 to 9 for a period of 3 months (Fig. 3A).

To compare the bioavailability of molecules encapsulated
within this liposomal containment system to that of naked
molecules, we developed a proof-of-principle system using
liposomally encapsulated D-luciferin and a luciferaseexpressing
tumor cell line. In this assay system, 5 3 105 luc21
tumor cells were implanted subcutaneously near the hindquarters
of C57BL/6 mice. Twenty-four hours later, D-luciferin (100 mL @
10 mg/mL) or liposomally encapsulated D-luciferin (100 mL @ 10
mg/mL) were administered subcutaneously near the forequarters.
Luminescence was then monitored for a continuous 2-hour
period by IVIS with post hoc photon measurement at the target
serving as a proxy for substrate absorption into circulation and
bioavailability. As shown in Figures 3B and C, liposomal
packaging of D-luciferin significantly enhanced both the speed
and magnitude at which this substrate was able to reach the
tumor site and induce photon emission, resulting in a full log-fold
enhancement of peak emissions at 60 minutes after D-luciferin
administration (*P , 0.05, **P , 0.01 for time points indicated).
Next, using the LPS acute inflammatory model, 200-ng LPS was
administered intraperitoneally, and circulating TNF-⍺ was
assayed every 30 minutes and plotted as a percentage of
preadministration TNF-⍺. Two hours after introduction of
LPS, mice were orally gavaged with 100-mL 10-mg/mL CBD,
10-mg/mL liposomal CBD, 10-mg/mL liposomal D-luciferin, or
PBS. As shown in Figure 3D, orally administered liposomal CBD
began to significantly reduce rising TNF-a levels within an hour of
administration, whereas an additional hour was required before
orally administered naked CBD significantly reduced rising TNF-a
levels in comparison with negative controls. Moreover, although
both naked and liposomally encapsulated CBD administered
orally significantly reduced relative levels of circulating TNF-⍺
below those of the negative controls, liposomally encapsulated
CBD made a significantly greater impact on such levels (*P ,
0.05, **P , 0.01 at 4 hours after CBD administration).
Encouraged by these data, we sought to validate enhanced
bioavailability of liposomally encapsulated CBD in healthy human
volunteers under the auspices of an IRB-approved and monitored
human crossover study. In brief, after provision of informed
consent, healthy human volunteers were randomized to receive
10-mg oral CBD in either a naked or liposomally encapsulated
formulation. Circulating CBD levels were determined from
preadministration and 1-hour postadministration blood draws.
At a second study visit, this procedure was repeated in the same
volunteer using the converse delivery method (ie, naked vs
liposomally encapsulated), and a bioavailability ratio was calculated.
For instances in which naked CBD administration produced
undetectable levels of circulating CBD, the bioavailability
ratio was calculated using an LOQ value of 0.05 ng/mL (limit of
detection). Among the 5 study volunteers for whom data were
available, the bioavailability of liposomally encapsulated CBD was
17.1 6 16-fold greater than that of naked CBD at 1-hour
postadministration (*P , 0.05). Furthermore, although 2 of 5
Figure 3. Liposomal encapsulation of small molecules enhances bioavailability. Sunflower lecithin (phosphatidylcholine) was used as a base to make liposomes
approximately 100 nmin size that could encapsulate small molecules at a concentration of 10 to 20 mg/mL and retain polydispersity and size for at least 3months at 4°C. (A) Stable size and polydispersity observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). (B) Cohorts of mice were implanted subcutaneously injected with 500,000 luc21 cells near the hindquarters. (B/C) Twenty-four hours later, D-luciferin (100 mL, 10 mg/mL) or D-luciferin liposomes (100 mL, 10 mg/mL) were applied subcutaneously near the forequarters, and animals were continually imaged by IVIS for 2 hours with subsequent photon measurement at the target serving as a proxy for absorption and bioavailability. (D) The ability of liposomal CBD to reduce TNF-⍺ production relative to controls and naked CBD was determined. For B and C, n55mice per cohort. Representative experiment of 3 shown. For D, n58mice per cohort. Representative experiment of 2 shown. Error bars6SD. *P, 0.05, **P , 0.01 by Student’s two-tailed t test. CBD, cannabidiol.  Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2196 C.D. Verrico et al.·161 (2020) 2191–2202 PAIN®
subjects exhibited undetectable circulating CBD levels after oral
administration of naked CBD isolate, all 5 subjects exhibited
detectable levels of circulating CBD levels after oral administration
of liposomally encapsulated CBD (Table 1).

3.4. Short-term administration of cannabidiol to domestic
canines diagnosed with osteoarthritis is safe and improves
quality of life
Although there exists a variety of different preclinical mouse
models of arthritis, as noted, these model chemical and
pathologic features of the disease have been poorly predictive
in determining symptomatic or therapeutic responses. In an
effort to better model treatment efficacy, we conducted
a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among
large (.20 kg; mean 5 41 6 15 kg) outbred canines with an
affirmative veterinary diagnosis of OA and experiencing decreased
mobility and quality of life. After diagnosis and provision
of owner informed consent, animals were enrolled and randomly
provided with identical medication bottles which contained one
of 4 treatments including 10-mg/mL naked CBD, 25-mg/mL
naked CBD, 10-mg/mL liposomal CBD, or a placebo consisting
only of fractionated coconut oil. Baseline and day 30 CBC and
metabolic panel as well as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and
alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) were also determined. Symptomology
was assessed by the attending study veterinarian
through clinical examination on days 0 and 30 and by each
animal’s owner on study days 0, 30, and 45 using the Helsinki
Chronic Pain Index assessment.18 Characteristics of each
enrolled animal are provided in Supplementary Table 1 (available
at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B3). As shown in Figure 4A/B,
owner assessment of animal symptomology was not significantly
altered by administration of placebo or 20-mg/day naked
CBD; however, administration of 50-mg/day naked CBD or 20-
mg/day liposomal CBD generated statistically significant reductions
in pain symptomology (**P,0.01), an effect that remained
statistically significant (*P , 0.05) for at least 15 days after
cessation of therapy. With some variability, veterinarian clinical
examination largely matched that of the owner’s assessment
with generally no improvements observed among animals
administered placebo or 20-mg/day naked CBD, and significant
improvements noted among all 4 assessment categories (sitting
to standing, lying to standing, walking, and running) among
dogs who received 50-mg/day naked CBD and 20-mg/day
liposomal CBD as evidenced by group compilation raw
assessment scores (Figs. 5A–D) or a secondary analysis (Fig.
6) that considered only whether symptomology in a given study
participant worsened, remained the same, or improved over the
course of therapy (*P ,0.05, **P ,0.01, ****P, 0.001). No sex
differences with regard to treatment efficacy were observed,
and there were no significant alterations to CBC, metabolic
panel, or ALT/ALKP values over the course of the study in any
group (Figs. 7A–C and Table 2).

4. Discussion
Arthritis is a painful degenerative condition that impacts the lives
of almost a quarter of all Americans, with OA in particular
accounting for 60% of all-cause arthritis diagnoses.2,23 Because
current treatment regimens are not curative and can be
accompanied by significant comorbidities,6,9,36 the present
studies were undertaken to validate whether the recently
legalized supplement CBD might positively impact the symptomology
of this degenerative condition. We first validated the
widely reported anti-inflammatory effects of CBD administration
both in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating substantial impact on
inflammatory cytokines and innate immune cell subsets relevant
to the pathophysiology of arthritis. After additional experimentation
that established greater bioavailability of liposomally
encapsulated vs naked CBD in both mice and humans, we
demonstrated the short-term clinical efficacy of CBD in
a double-blind, placebo-controlled veterinary study in which
neither owner nor veterinarian knew the content of the study
medications. In this study, neither animals given placebo nor
animals given a low daily dose of naked CBD responded to
therapy in any significant fashion. Conversely, animals given
a high dose of naked CBD or a low dose of liposomally
encapsulated CBD experienced significant improvements in
quality of life scores as documented by both owner and
veterinarian assessments. In this setting, administration of
CBD was not associated with any significant alterations to
circulating lymphocyte subsets, clinical chemistry values, or
assessed metabolic parameters.
In vitro and in vivo studies focused on important pathologic
mechanisms applicable to a wide variety of arthritis etiologies.
We found that CBD significantly reduced LPS- and SEBinduced
production of TNF-⍺ in human and mouse cell lines
and PBMC, consistent with the results of previous studies.
3,51,60 Similarly, in a croton oil-induced murine model of
inflammation, we found that topical administration of CBD
significantly reduced TNF-⍺ production and MPO activity, the
latter of which is consistent with previous reports of systemic
CBD administration in mice.4,50 Consistent with previous in
vivo studies, we demonstrated that CBD also significantly
reduced LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine33,37 and
neutrophil production,40 while increasing anti-inflammatory
IL-10 production in a dose-responsive fashion.33 Given the
wide variety of grades, formulations, and suppliers of
commercially available CBD, it was important to validate and
characterize the functional activity of the CBD isolate planned
for use in subsequent veterinary studies. In those studies, the
finding that 50 mg/day of naked CBD-improved treatment
outcomes is consistent with a previous study in dogs with
OA14; however, this is the first report of a randomized, doubleblind,
placebo-controlled study that uses a spontaneous
model for assessing the potential therapeutic effects of CBD
for treating OA pain and increasing quality of life. As in humans,
the pathogenesis of canine OA involves changes in all tissues
of the synovial joint.5,24,31,34,38 The dominant symptom of OA
for both humans and dogs is pain, and the current therapeutic
goal for both species is management of that pain and
Table 1
Naked vs liposomally encapsulated circulating CBD levels in
healthy volunteers.
Subject Naked CBD Liposomal CBD Ratio
Pre
(ng/mL)
Post
(ng/mL)
Pre
(ng/mL)
Post
(ng/mL)
1 0.00 0.87 0.00 5.90 6.8
2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 17.4
3 0.00 0.14 0.10 2.00 13.6
4 0.00 0.00 0.19 2.40 44.2
5 0.00 0.45 0.00 1.60 3.6
Averages 0.29 6 0.37 2.55 6 1.95 17.1 6 16.1
CBD, cannabidiol.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
September 2020·Volume 161·Number 9 www.painjournalonline.com 2197
associated movement deficits.7 Thus, an extrapolation of
these findings suggest that CBD could be useful for treating
pain and improving quality of life in humans with an affirmative
diagnosis of OA and/or other inflammatory conditions that
might be ameliorated by a reduction in proinflammatory
cytokines and pathologic neutrophil activity.
The absorption of CBD administered by smoking, vaporization,
buccal spray, or oral ingestion is highly variable and
results in extremely inconsistent pharmacokinetic profiles
when investigated.21,39,42,44,52 Cannabidiol also shows limited
oral bioavailability due to poor aqueous solubility and extensive
first-pass metabolism.22,41,55 Although the current study did
not assess pharmacokinetic parameters among canine study
participants, the effect of liposomal CBD on LPS-induced
TNF-a production in mice provides an objective measure of its
pharmacodynamic drug action and suggests a greater
Figure 4. Daily administration of CBD for 30 days improves owner-perspective quality of life scores among large dogs with affirmative diagnosis of osteoarthritis.
Twenty large domestic canines with affirmative diagnosis of osteoarthritis were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. Animals were
administered coconut oil placebo, 20-mg/day naked CBD, 50-mg/day naked CBD, or 20-mg/day liposomal CBD. Owners assessed their animals by means of the
Helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HPCI) on days 0, 30, and 45. (A) Individual HPCI values were plotted for each study cohort on days 0 and 30. (B) Cohort HPCI values
were plotted on days 0, 30, and 45. Error bars 6 SD. *P , 0.05, **P , 0.01 by Student’s two-tailed t test. CBD, cannabidiol.
Figure 5. Daily administration of CBD for 30 days improves veterinarian-perspective subset quality of life scores among large dogs with affirmative diagnosis of
osteoarthritis. Study enrolled canine subjects were scored by the (blinded) study veterinarian on days 0 and 30 using a scale of 1 (best) to 5 (worst) for 4 different
movements consisting of sitting to standing (A), lying to standing (B), walking (C), and running (D). Subset scale data comparing day 0 and day 30 scores for each
task are shown by cohort. Error bars 6 SEM. *P , 0.05, **P , 0.01 by Student’s two-tailed t test. CBD, cannabidiol.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2198 C.D. Verrico et al.·161 (2020) 2191–2202 PAIN®
bioavailability than naked CBD. Although previous studies
regarding the bioavailability of liposomal CBD are not found in
the literature, a single study of D9-THC, the main psychoactive
constituent in cannabis, reported that liposomal encapsulation
improved bioavailability in rats in comparison with
administration of the naked molecule.53 Based on these
animal studies, we performed an IRB-approved crossover
study in healthy human volunteers to validate approved
bioavailability of CBD after liposomal encapsulation. The data
demonstrated a 17-fold increase in bioavailable circulating
Figure 6. Daily administration of CBD for 30 days improves veterinarian-perspective overall quality of life scores among large dogs with affirmative diagnosis of
osteoarthritis. Study-enrolled canine subjects were scored by the (blinded) study veterinarian on days 0 and 30 using a scale of 1 (best) to 5 (worst) for 4 different
movements consisting of sitting to standing, lying to standing, walking, and running. Data are represented as pie charts indicating percent of each cohort that
showed improvement, worsening, or no change in condition for the animals enrolled in each study group. **P , 0.01, ****P , 0.001 by Pearson’s x2. CBD,
cannabidiol.
Figure 7. Daily administration of CBD for 30 days does not alter alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) levels. Blood was drawn from
animals we enrolled in the clinical study on days 0 and 30, and Chem10 analysis was performed. (A) Relative changes in circulating ALT and ALKP values over the
30-day period. (B, C) Specific changes in circulating ALT and ALKP values over the 30-day period. Dark horizontal lines outline normal range. Error bars 6 SD. No
statistically significant changes were observed. CBD, cannabidiol.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
September 2020·Volume 161·Number 9 www.painjournalonline.com 2199
Table 2
Veterinary study CBC, metabolic panel, and clinical chemistry values.
Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30
WBC (K/uL) WBC (K/uL) Lymphocytes
(K/uL)
Lymphocytes
(K/uL)
Neutrophils
(K/uL)
Neutrophils
(K/uL)
Basophils
(K/uL)
Basophils
(K/uL)
Eosinophils
(K/uL)
Eosinophils
(K/uL)
Placebo 8.84 (62.52) 9.1 (62.01) 1.34 (60.51) 1.6 (60.68) 6.45 (62.25) 6.2 (61.75) 0.015 (60.007) 0.017 (60.009) 0.535 (60.38) 0.596 (60.24)
20 mg/day 9.496 (61.11) 10.168 (63.01) 1.486 (60.50) 1.628 (60.68) 6.954 (60.81) 7.446 (62.36) 0.014 (60.008) 0.024 (60.005) 0.4 (60.2) 0.564 (60.3)
20 mg lips/day 9.77 (61.71) 8.89 (61.35) 1.68 (60.73) 1.95 (60.82) 6.74 (61.75) 5.875 (61.31) 0.0225 (60.005) 0.0175 (60.003) 0.67 (60.45) 0.452 (60.25)
50 mg/day 8.39 (61.07) 9.25 (61.74) 1.72 (60.78) 1.91 (60.82) 5.44 (60.95) 5.99 (61.66) 0.0125 (60.003) 0.03 (60.01) 0.495 (60.19) 0.46 (60.38)
Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30
RBC (K/uL) RBC (K/uL) HCT (%) HCT (%) HGB (g/dL) HGB (g/dL) Platelets (K/uL) Platelets (K/uL)
Placebo 6.34 (61.01) 7.1 (61.15) 47.8 (66.25) 44.3 (69.1) 15.2 (62.34) 15.8 (62.1) 242.0 (647.2) 248.5 (642.2)
20 mg/day 7.71 (60.41) 7.79 (60.48) 50.36 (63.29) 50.46 (64.84) 17.2 (61.12) 17.1 (61.36) 253.4 (645.8) 259.8 (668.8)
20 mg lips/day 7.38 (60.88) 7.41 (60.73) 50.82 (64.2) 49.82 (65.12) 16.97 (61.76) 17.25 (61.43) 261.0 (642.1) 272.0 (623.4)
50 mg/day 7.08 (60.79) 6.74 (61.35) 48.25 (67.11) 44.0 (67.45) 16.32 (62.27) 14.75 (62.45) 387.5 (642.48) 427.0 (653.35)
Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30
Glucose
(mg/dL)
Glucose
(mg/dL)
Creatinine
(mg/dL)
Creatinine
(mg/dL)
BUN (mg/dL) BUN (mg/dL)
Placebo 98.0 (67.53) 105.5 (69.25) 1.25 (60.19) 1.28 (60.22) 13.0 (64.24) 14.5 (64.1)
20 mg/day 103.8 (614.24) 102.6 (67.89) 1.34 (60.38) 1.34 (60.34) 18.6 (66.22) 18.6 (64.39)
20 mg lips/day 119.5 (632.1) 102.25 (68.31) 1.125 (60.17) 1.175 (60.377) 15.20 (66.16) 15.0 (68.32)
50 mg/day 107.25 (66.75) 114.0 (610.23) 1.375 (60.35) 1.5 (60.42) 21.25 (64.5) 16.5 (60.7)
Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30
Albumin (G/dL) Albumin (G/dL) Globulin (G/dL) Globulin (G/dL) A:G ratio A:G ratio
Placebo 3.225 (60.41) 3.4 (60.38) 3.62 (60.52) 3.65 (60.42) 0.9 (60.12) 0.93 (60.1)
20 mg/day 3.08 (60.14) 3.3 (60.24) 3.94 (60.16) 3.7 (60.44) 0.82 (60.18) 0.92 (60.16)
20 mg lips/day 3.52 (60.34) 3.52 (60.18) 3.575 (60.36) 3.425 (60.46) 1.0 (60.14) 1.05 (60.13)
50 mg/day 3.375 (60.377) 3.5 (60.075) 4.05 (60.33) 4.05 (60.22) 0.825 (60.15) 0.8 (60.1)
Day 0 Day 30 Day 0 Day 30
ALT (U/L) ALT (U/L) ALKP (U/L) ALKP (U/L)
Placebo 52.0 (619.7) 63.25 (615.65) 76.5 (615.2) 81.2 (623.5)
20 mg/day 109.2 (678.7) 85.2 (654.5) 86.4 (659.7) 95.2 (667.8)
20 mg lips/day 128.6 (686.28) 124.6 (690.25) 106.25 (644.9) 147.5 (646.4)
50 mg/day 83.25 (629.57) 79.5 (640.79) 129.9 (621.2) 138.5 (625.4)
ALKP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CBC, complete blood count; HCT, hematocrit; RBC, red blood cells; WBC, white blood cells.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2200 C.D. Verrico et al.·161 (2020) 2191–2202 PAIN®
CBD after oral administration of the liposomal formulation as
compared to the naked isolate.
5. Conclusions
In summary, we demonstrate here that the widely available
supplement CBD exerts robust and quantifiable antiinflammatory
properties in experimental systems. These experimental
results were translatable in a randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial in a spontaneous canine model of OA. In
this assessment, administration of liposomally encapsulated or
high-dose naked CBD (but not low-dose naked CBD or placebo)
was associated with significant improvements to quality of life as
quantitated by both owner and veterinarian. The results suggest
that clinical studies in humans may be warranted in a variety of
different etiologies and disease stages of arthritis.
Conflict of interest statement
Institutional policy requires W.K. Decker, M.M. Halpert, and V.
Konduri to declare their ownership stakes in Diakonos Research,
Ltd, an unrelated immuno-oncology company. In addition, M.M.
Halpert is a paid scientific advisor for Medterra CBD. The
remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded in part by a sponsored research agreement
(to M.M.H.) between Medterra CBD, Inc, and Baylor College of
Medicine. This project was also supported in part by the
Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core at Baylor College of Medicine
with funding from the NIH (AI036211, CA125123, and
RR024574). Flow cytometry analysis was performed with the
expert assistance of Joel M. Sederstrom.
Author contributions: C.D. Verrico wrote the article and analyzed
data. S. Wesson designed and performed experiments, analyzed
data, and contributed critical research tools. V. Konduri analyzed
data. C.J. Hofferek performed experiments. J. Vazquez-Perez
performed experiments. E. Blair designed and performed
experiments, analyzed data, and contributed critical research
tools. K. Dunner analyzed data. P. Salimpour analyzed data and
provided critical research tools. W.K. Decker analyzed data, wrote
the article, and provided critical research tools. M.M. Halpert
designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, wrote the
article, and provided critical research tools.
Appendix A. Supplemental digital content
Supplemental digital content associated with this article can be
found online at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B3.
Article history:
Received 18 February 2020
Received in revised form 2 April 2020
Accepted 16 April 2020
Available online 24 April 2020
References
[1] Bannwarth B. Acetaminophen or NSAIDs for the treatment of
osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2006;20:117–29.
[2] Barbour KE, Helmick CG, Boring M, Brady TJ. Vital signs: prevalence of
doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity
limitation—United States, 2013-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep
2017;66:246–53.
[3] Ben-Shabat S, Hanus LO, Katzavian G, Gallily R. New cannabidiol
derivatives: synthesis, binding to cannabinoid receptor, and evaluation of
their antiinflammatory activity. J Med Chem 2006;49:1113–17.
[4] Borrelli F, Aviello G, Romano B, Orlando P, Capasso R, Maiello F,
Guadagno F, Petrosino S, Capasso F, Di Marzo V, Izzo AA. Cannabidiol,
a safe and non-psychotropic ingredient of the marijuana plant Cannabis
sativa, is protective in a murine model of colitis. J Mol Med (Berl) 2009;87:
1111–21.
[5] Brandt KD, Braunstein EM, Visco DM, O’Connor B, Heck D, Albrecht M.
Anterior (cranial) cruciate ligament transection in the dog: a bona fide
model of osteoarthritis, not merely of cartilage injury and repair.
J Rheumatol 1991;18:436–46.
[6] Bullock J, Rizvi SAA, Saleh AM, Ahmed SS, Do DP, Ansari RA, Ahmed J.
Rheumatoid arthritis: a brief overview of the treatment. Med Princ Pract
2018;27:501–7.
[7] Cimino Brown D. What can we learn from osteoarthritis pain in companion
animals? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2017;35(suppl 107):53–8.
[8] Clayton N, Collins S, Sargent R, Brown T, Nobbs M, Bountra C, Trezise
D. The effect of the novel sodium channel blocker 4030W92 in models
of acute and chronic inflammatory pain. Br J Pharmacol 1998;123:79.
[9] Cooper C, Bardin T, Brandi ML, Cacoub P, Caminis J, Civitelli R, Cutolo
M, Dere W, Devogelaer JP, Diez-Perez A, Einhorn TA, Emonts P, Ethgen
O, Kanis JA, Kaufman JM, Kvien TK, LemsWF, McCloskey E,Miossec P,
Reiter S, Ringe J, Rizzoli R, Saag K, Reginster JY. Balancing benefits and
risks of glucocorticoids in rheumatic diseases and other inflammatory joint
disorders: new insights from emerging data. An expert consensus paper
from the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of
Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Aging Clin Exp Res 2016;28:
1–16.
[10] Couch DG, Cook H, Ortori C, Barrett D, Lund JN, O’Sullivan SE.
Palmitoylethanolamide and cannabidiol prevent inflammation-induced
hyperpermeability of the human gut in vitro and in vivo-A randomized,
placebo-controlled, double-blind controlled trial. Inflamm Bowel Dis
2019;25:1006–18.
[11] Couch DG, Tasker C, Theophilidou E, Lund JN, O’Sullivan SE.
Cannabidiol and palmitoylethanolamide are anti-inflammatory in the
acutely inflamed human colon. Clin Sci (Lond) 2017;131:2611–26.
[12] del Rio C, Navarrete C, Collado JA, Bellido ML, Gomez-Canas M, Pazos
MR, Fernandez-Ruiz J, Pollastro F, AppendinoG, Calzado MA, Cantarero
I, Munoz E. The cannabinoid quinol VCE-004.8 alleviates bleomycininduced
scleroderma and exerts potent antifibrotic effects through
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma and CB2 pathways.
Sci Rep 2016;6:21703.
[13] Gallily R, Yekhtin Z, Hanus LO. The anti-inflammatory properties of
terpenoids from cannabis. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2018;3:282–90.
[14] Gamble LJ, Boesch JM, Frye CW, Schwark WS, Mann S,Wolfe L, Brown
H, Berthelsen ES, Wakshlag JJ. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical
efficacy of cannabidiol treatment in osteoarthritic dogs. Front Vet Sci
2018;5:165.
[15] Hammell DC, Zhang LP, Ma F, Abshire SM, McIlwrath SL, Stinchcomb
AL, Westlund KN. Transdermal cannabidiol reduces inflammation and
pain-related behaviours in a rat model of arthritis. Eur J Pain 2016;20:
936–48.
[16] Haraden CA, Huebner JL, Hsueh MF, Li YJ, Kraus VB. Synovial fluid
biomarkers associated with osteoarthritis severity reflect macrophage
and neutrophil related inflammation. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21:146.
[17] Hay M, Thomas DW, Craighead JL, Economides C, Rosenthal J. Clinical
development success rates for investigational drugs. Nat Biotechnol
2014;32:40–51.
[18] Hielm-Bjorkman AK, Rita H, Tulamo RM. Psychometric testing of the
Helsinki chronic pain index by completion of a questionnaire in Finnish by
owners of dogs with chronic signs of pain caused by osteoarthritis. Am J
Vet Res 2009;70:727–34.
[19] Hill R. NK1 (substance P) receptor antagonists—why are they not
analgesic in humans? Trends Pharmacol Sci 2000;21:244–6.
[20] Huang Y, Wan T, Pang N, Zhou Y, Jiang X, Li B, Gu Y, Huang Y, Ye X, Lian
H, Zhang Z, Yang L. Cannabidiol protects livers against nonalcoholic
steatohepatitis induced by high-fat high cholesterol diet via regulating NFkappaB
and NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. J Cell Physiol 2019;234:
21224–34.
[21] Huestis MA. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the plant
cannabinoids, delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and
cannabinol. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2005;168:657–90.
[22] Huestis MA. Human cannabinoid pharmacokinetics. Chem Biodivers
2007;4:1770–804.
[23] Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet 2019;393:1745–59.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
September 2020·Volume 161·Number 9 www.painjournalonline.com 2201
[24] Innes JF, Fuller CJ, Grover ER, Kelly AL, Burn JF. Randomised, doubleblind,
placebo-controlled parallel group study of P54FP for the treatment
of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003;152:457–60.
[25] Jastrzab A, Gegotek A, Skrzydlewska E. Cannabidiol regulates the
expression of keratinocyte proteins involved in the inflammation process
through transcriptional regulation. Cells 2019;8:pii:E827.
[26] KapoorM, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, Pelletier JP, Fahmi H. Role of
proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat
Rev Rheumatol 2011;7:33–42.
[27] Katchan V, David P, Shoenfeld Y. Cannabinoids and autoimmune
diseases: a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev 2016;15:513–28.
[28] Kawase Y, Hoshino T, Yokota K, Kuzuhara A, Kirii Y, Nishiwaki E, Maeda
Y, Takeda J, Okamoto M, Kato S, Imaizumi T, Aizawa H, Yoshino K.
Exacerbated and prolonged allergic and non-allergic inflammatory
cutaneous reaction in mice with targeted interleukin-18 expression in
the skin. J Invest Dermatol 2003;121:502–9.
[29] Kolhekar R, Meller ST, Gebhart GF. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptormediated
changes in thermal nociception: allosteric modulation at glycine
and polyamine recognition sites. Neuroscience 1994;63:925–36.
[30] Krajewska JB, Bartoszek A, Fichna J. New trends in liposome-based
drug delivery in colorectal cancer. Mini Rev Med Chem 2019;19:3–11.
[31] Lang J, Busato A, Baumgartner D, Fluckiger M, Weber UT. Comparison
of two classification protocols in the evaluation of elbow dysplasia in the
dog. J Small Anim Pract 1998;39:169–74.
[32] Lin J, ZhangW, Jones A, Doherty M. Efficacy of topical non-steroidal antiinflammatory
drugs in the treatment of osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of
randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2004;329:324.
[33] Liu DZ, Hu CM, Huang CH, Wey SP, Jan TR. Cannabidiol attenuates
delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions via suppressing T-cell and
macrophage reactivity. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2010;31:1611–17.
[34] LiuW, Burton-Wurster N, Glant TT, Tashman S, Sumner DR, Kamath RV,
Lust G, Kimura JH, Cs-Szabo G. Spontaneous and experimental
osteoarthritis in dog: similarities and differences in proteoglycan levels.
J Orthop Res 2003;21:730–7.
[35] Lowin T, Schneider M, Pongratz G. Joints for joints: cannabinoids in the
treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2019;31:271–8.
[36] Luis M, Freitas J, Costa F, Buttgereit F, Boers M, Jap DS, Santiago T. An
updated review of glucocorticoid-related adverse events in patients with
rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2019;18:581–90.
[37] Malfait AM, Gallily R, Sumariwalla PF, Malik AS, Andreakos E, Mechoulam
R, Feldmann M. The nonpsychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol
is an oral anti-arthritic therapeutic in murine collagen-induced arthritis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:9561–6.
[38] McCoy AM. Animal models of osteoarthritis: comparisons and key
considerations. Vet Pathol 2015;52:803–18.
[39] McGilveray IJ. Pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids. Pain ResManag 2005;
10(suppl A):15A–22A.
[40] McHugh D, Tanner C, Mechoulam R, Pertwee RG, Ross RA. Inhibition of
human neutrophil chemotaxis by endogenous cannabinoids and
phytocannabinoids: evidence for a site distinct from CB1 and CB2. Mol
Pharmacol 2008;73:441–50.
[41] Mechoulam R, Parker LA, Gallily R. Cannabidiol: an overview of some
pharmacological aspects. J Clin Pharmacol 2002;42:11S–9S.
[42] Millar SA, Stone NL, Yates AS, O’Sullivan SE. A systematic review on the
pharmacokinetics of cannabidiol in humans. Front Pharmacol 2018;9:
1365.
[43] Muthumalage T, Rahman I. Cannabidiol differentially regulates basal and
LPS-induced inflammatory responses in macrophages, lung epithelial
cells, and fibroblasts. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2019;382:114713.
[44] Ohlsson A, Lindgren JE, Andersson S, Agurell S, Gillespie H, Hollister LE.
Single-dose kinetics of deuterium-labelled cannabidiol in man after
smoking and intravenous administration. Biomed Environ Mass
Spectrom 1986;13:77–83.
[45] Orange DE, Blachere NE, DiCarlo EF, Mirza S, Pannellini T, Jiang CS,
Frank MO, Parveen S, Figgie MP, Gravallese EM, Bykerk VP, Orbai AM,
Mackie SL, Goodman SM. Rheumatoid arthritis morning stiffness is
associated with synovial fibrin and neutrophils. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;
72:557–64.
[46] Park J, Mendy A, Vieira ER. Various types of arthritis in the United States:
prevalence and age-related trends from 1999 to 2014.AmJ Public Health
2018;108:256–8.
[47] Petrosino S, Verde R, Vaia M, Allara M, Iuvone T, Di Marzo V. Antiinflammatory
properties of cannabidiol, a nonpsychotropic cannabinoid,
in experimental allergic contact dermatitis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2018;
365:652–63.
[48] Philpott HT, O’Brien M, McDougall JJ. Attenuation of early phase
inflammation by cannabidiol prevents pain and nerve damage in rat
osteoarthritis. PAIN 2017;158:2442–51.
[49] Ridgley LA, Anderson AE, Pratt AG. What are the dominant
cytokines in early rheumatoid arthritis? Curr Opin Rheumatol
2018;30:207–14.
[50] Schicho R, Storr M. Topical and systemic cannabidiol improves
trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid colitis in mice. Pharmacology 2012;89:
149–55.
[51] Silva RL, Silveira GT, Wanderlei CW, Cecilio NT, Maganin AGM,
Franchin M, Marques LMM, Lopes NP, Crippa JA, Guimaraes FS,
Alves-Filho JCF, Cunha FQ, Cunha TM. DMH-CBD, a cannabidiol
analog with reduced cytotoxicity, inhibits TNF production by targeting
NF-kB activity dependent on A2A receptor. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol
2019;368:63–71.
[52] Stott CG, White L, Wright S, Wilbraham D, Guy GW. A phase I study to
assess the effect of food on the single dose bioavailability of the THC/CBD
oromucosal spray. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013;69:825–34.
[53] Szczesniak AM, Kelly ME, Whynot S, Shek PN, Hung O. Ocular
hypotensive effects of an intratracheally delivered liposomal delta9-
tetrahydrocannabinol preparation in rats. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2006;
22:160–7.
[54] Towheed TE, Maxwell L, Judd MG, Catton M, Hochberg MC, Wells G.
Acetaminophen for osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;1:
CD004257.
[55] Ujvary I, Hanus L. Human metabolites of cannabidiol: a review on their
formation, biological activity, and relevance in therapy. Cannabis
Cannabinoid Res 2016;1:90–101.
[56] Vincent TL, Williams RO, Maciewicz R, Silman A, Garside P; Arthritis
Research UKamwg. Mapping pathogenesis of arthritis through small
animal models. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:1931–41.
[57] Vuolo F, Abreu SC, Michels M, Xisto DG, Blanco NG, Hallak JE, Zuardi
AW, Crippa JA, Reis C, Bahl M, Pizzichinni E, Maurici R, Pizzichinni MMM,
Rocco PRM, Dal-Pizzol F. Cannabidiol reduces airway inflammation and
fibrosis in experimental allergic asthma. Eur J Pharmacol 2019;843:
251–9.
[58] Wallace MS, Rowbotham M, Bennett GJ, Jensen TS, Pladna R, Quessy
S. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled
crossover evaluation of a short course of 4030W92 in patients with
chronic neuropathic pain. J Pain 2002;3:227–33.
[59] Wallace MS, Rowbotham MC, Katz NP, Dworkin RH, Dotson RM, Galer
BS, Rauck RL, Backonja MM, Quessy SN, Meisner PD. A randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a glycine antagonist in
neuropathic pain. Neurology 2002;59:1694–700.
[60] Watzl B, Scuderi P, Watson RR. Influence ofmarijuana components (THC
and CBD) on human mononuclear cell cytokine secretion in vitro. Adv Exp
Med Biol 1991;288:63–70.
[61] Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N,
Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M,
Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI
recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis,
Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008;16:137–62.
Copyright © 2020 by the International Association for the Study of Pain. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
2202 C.D. Verrico et al.·161 (2020) 2191–2202 PAIN®


Share this post



← Older Post Newer Post →


0 comments

Leave a comment


brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand
brand